You're welcome!! @Chloesakuramoon ♡＼(￣▽￣)／♡

Next time with small vandalism, I suggest you revert the edit yourself instead of making a post. To do this, go into version history and undo the newest edit (undo button)

My reaction if there's a GIANT vandalism:

Then:

After:

*Me slapping the person who did it*

@Z3N1TY0 While I don't have an issue with someone who isn't staff reverting vandalism, it should still be reported none the less. Additionally, if the vandal keeps re-vandalizing the page it becomes pointless to try and revert it for non-staff and is just a losing battle until staff can intervene.

^ Imo the quicker it’s reverted the better. If you’re gonna make a post about small, one-time vandalism (I think this is one-time), at least revert it first and maybe call out whoever did it in version history

That’s just my opinion

Absolutely, I was highlighting that reports should still be made and that normal users shouldn't waste time if the vandal is trying to engage in an edit war. Doing so actually comes with the risk of accidently getting caught in the crossfire. Both wiki staff and automated filters have accidently blocked innocent people during edit wars with vandals.

Oh ok thx :)

As a helper I should start working more on trying to revert the edits, but if it's something that you're able to take care of, I recommend fixing it itself unless if you don't know what was on the page beforehand. (Sorry I haven't been as active I got out of the hospital a few days ago)

But if the Vandal is continuing to vandalize other pages that's when you should report the user to someone's message wall, you can always report to mine, I'd be happy to assist you.

*The vandalism should always be reported; whether it's been reverted or not.