Thread:Jackboog21/@comment-8846246-20180112042820/@comment-5346296-20180113014723

So if neither takes the case then the user isn't helped? Hopefully staff would be reliable enough at that point (ban length n all that), they probably would be reliable though. Users may be a bit iffy about there being a selection on who is heard but that would mostly be up to the heads.

I feel like the approval rating thingy would have to depend on the number of staff voting, if there were a small amount, it would be shame for someone to get outvoted on an issue (with the intern being the tie break) and engage in the argument that 'since I didn't vote for them, why should they get to decide whether my rule gets put through?' that sorta thing, equal footing and all that.

Since we can't predict when the fandom will super grow (probably around kickstarter, close to kickstarter, and actual game but none of those are really set) then it may be best to take it reeeal slow, unless things magically get really active. I'm talking about the whole council thing in general, there are a few things that need to be sorted first. (policy n all that) Focusing on the wiki as a whole before sorting out small things. (I'd guess that one of the first community rule change vote would be on the swearing and that doesn't really matter right now)

I'm excited to see some results, hopefully they are useful but yeah, slow and steady wins the race. We've got a good WAM score but nothing that warrants a lotta change.