Thread:Travid117/@comment-8846246-20171214154301/@comment-5346296-20171214214624

I know he's been inactive (he might be on chat though, if that counts, he's been active on twitter so idk if that's an indication) but is Grape's opinion going to be considered (even if he isn't giving it)? Since this is currently a very inactive time where nothing much is going on, if staff aren't needed then I think that should also be taken into account.

I quite like the rule since we've already demoted due to inactivity so it'd be nice to have a concrete rule in place, it would also prevent unnecessary threads that could (probably wouldn't) create drama. I'd suggest giving the user two weeks rather than one, if they truly are sorting out issues it'll give them time to respond.

I also suggest a rule about helpers who do nothing to increase their rank, since a helper role is supposed to be a stepping stone, just makes it seem like they only want it for the title if they do nothing else. It would also allow people who actually want to progress to do so (however I'm not seeing much of that lately so slowly is alright wth me for the time being)

So the people this rule would demote with none of the consideration i've gone into above would be: (If I make mistakes, my apologies, never been great with dates)

EwImTrash

Ariariariari :P

SeiShii

Would inactivity due to certain roles also be considered? For example, chat mods never going on chat, Rollbacks never editing (depends on circumstances such as barren chat and no one editing)