Board Thread:Staff/@comment-8846246-20180503020057/@comment-5346296-20180511090716

I don’t think positions should be filled just cause, most effective wikis I’ve seen run with few very competent staff, however, people will apply regardless so there’s no helping that, inadequate staff would drop off anyway. (We probably need to sort out how many votes one needs, I think Kawaii’s app has gone through?)

I don’t think that low amount of users should lower the requirements especially when we don’t need staff, I could understand if we needed it. Low quality staff is just bad for wiki image/quality. Have we figured out how long someone should be a helper before their quality is brought into question? Upping other ranks is a good idea with the lowering of other ranks, it would mean harder work which is good, but would also probably mean way more helpers demoted than promoted.

I do wonder if it should be up to the position they aspire to, those going for chat > discussion are probably going to have an easier time getting a lot of edits, unless you edit a whole lot.