Thread:Jackboog21/@comment-8846246-20180112042820/@comment-5346296-20180112160611

I'd say creating more than two would be a bit too divisive and may also exclude relevant users from discussions (Like if one group were discussing issues relevant to another). Since I'm also a big fan of quality over quantity staff wise (Large, structured wikias that work well usually have this, just from what I've seen) I don't think staff numbers should get to the point where it's too crowded to have two, unless bias starts to emerge. Am I right in saying that the head Helper would be a representative of the peoples council?

Question, with the COTP, they would vote for a rule to pass onto the COA for voting?

"However, Interns would instead work different here. Here they'd be chosen by a full staff vote from the non-staff members." What does full staff vote from non-staff members mean? Is it a standard vote?

With interns, comparing this community to the fan wiki community, there's a massive difference, not just technically in regards to stuff like WAM scores, this wiki is extremely community based for a canon wiki, quite personal and all that, someone needs to participate in this specific community before coming in. (Especially since the wiki currently doesn't need any help) An intern coming in would, I feel, only be necessary if the wiki is in trouble (Say almost all staff are inactive) or if they are already in this wiki, the fan wiki could also do with some growing first. Canon and fanon wiki's are also pretty different in general.

Definitely support the 'trial run' of all this. Not 100% on the word 'council' but I haven't seen anything in action yet.

(I think there are currently problems with bias and all that so I think a discussion about helpers (in general, the position, not the current staff) and the staff vote stuff could be a discussion at one point.)

(Shall staff attendance and all that be discussed after this?)