Thread:Jackboog21/@comment-8846246-20180112042820/@comment-27862439-20180113000536

This seems like a lot to implement all at once. Again, if possible I'd like some idea of how this has served you on your Fan Wiki. Does this system merely sound good, or has it had concrete results?

We're not running a country, we're running a wiki with probably a few dozen active users at any point in time. I agree that a team of high quality and active users is more valuable than a large team with extensive subdivisions. The staff should be balanced and suitably sized for the needs of the wiki. I still don't think we're at the level of growth where highly structured "councils" are necessary, though that could change. I'm not opposed to trying your system as an experiment, but I recommend we start with adding staff meetings first and see how it goes from there. We can gradually add more structure if it suits our needs.