Talk:Police/@comment-24761458-20151211091644/@comment-2248043-20151213235729

Might as well just not read my comments, or not respond after you read because I comment everywhere. You already seem to have a problem with me and so now I have to reply to you because you still seem to be talking to me even though you don't agree with the way I do things. You didn't like it on one of the new RP threads, you don't like my long posts as stated there and on my blog post about Nicole... so...

I was only saying that because you really shouldn't trust Kubz Scouts. He's like the people who wrote Indiana Jones, honestly. Now there's a person in the comments section who seems to trust what is seen in a Let's Play video. Aren't we, as the experts, supposed to educate the fandom about this game? Kubz Scouts is spreading this weird things to the fandom and nobody really calls him out on it even when he's wrong. You can't just have fun like that if you're going to spread little rumors. People then go to the wikia and then spread that stuff here, which might get on the articles. I'm trying to stop that.

I know I'm being a bit honest, but I usually crticize others when it would in some way mess up the wikia or lower its reputation. I take time to put up sources and write long posts for others when people don't even read them. I try to think of fun things for the users to do and even when I'm cynical I try to end things with a positive note, if I can. It's not like when taking care of a wikia you can just slack off and let things slide. I don't go out of my way to criticize people just because I'm a "downer" but because people are unintentionally spreading rumors or doing unintentional bad things.

When I criticize others, I'm not just insulting them and getting angry. I tell them what they did wrong and how to fix it. I show them why they're wrong. If I hadn't done that, if I didn't be a "downer" the same people would continue to post things without references and such. It drives people out of the wikia, but it's the only way to stop future bad edits from them. I'm a "downer" because I'm trying to help people and show that they made a mistake but can fix it. I don't laugh at people and point, but I try and be serious and discuss things. That involves being negative because I can't always sugarcoat what people do. How are people supposed to improve if they don't get told that they're wrong? It's just that people on this wikia are often wrong or somewhat misled. I don't shout at them and instead I just talk it through. Yeah, it's disappointing for them to have that happen but it has to be done.

That's for most edits and people, anyways. For Lillybug her post was fine but I just wanted to inform her that Kubz isn't that trustworthy, which is the cold, hard truth. Still, I said that he was funny and that he sometimes does good. Good and bad sides of him shown. I'm just talking about all the other things I did, since you said to "stop being a downer" and you seem to be fed up with what I do. I'm really trying hard to not shout at others and instead explain things so that mistakes don't happen in the future. I suppose I could try to congratulate people on edits more, since nobody ever does that around here (probably too busy). I also might try to word things differently, but I won't change the size of my posts. I appreciate the feedback but I really wish you would've worded that differently. In the future, please don't respond if you're still angry, unless you have to. You might be thinking, "You just said that people should be called out if they made mistakes, like what you're doing. I'm not allowed to do it?" but I think that as a person who doesn't call anyone else out on their mistakes, you shouldn't talk to me then.