Board Thread:Staff/@comment-8846246-20190301080658/@comment-8846246-20190302051657

In terms of policy, there isn't much we can do to improve how the councils work. The COA is working fine, albeit understaffed.

And with Seishii likely to be demoted soon, once a replacement is found the COTP's state should improve. Even simply the demotion would push the COTP to only need 2 votes to pass anything. Additionally, required votes are being done.

Currently, we wouldn't be creating many committees. I plan to bring a temp committee to vote that'll last 1 month if this passes. After it's disbanded, either the News or Historical committee would go to vote.

Non-staff members in committees would only be for some committees. For example; Non-staff could be in the Historical Committee, but not the Formatting Committee.

And picking non-staff members would be on the Senior Chairman. If they pick non-productive users, then they should fire those users. If they don't, then the COA can consider firing the chairman.

Same goes for picking friends. When it comes to the Build Documentation Committee, I don't think it'd be a problem. But I could see if being an issue with some. When it's an issue, the COA can consider firing the chairman.

Both of these reasons are also a reason the Junior Chairman isn't picked by the COA, to try and balance the committee bias or productivity the COTP gets to pick them.