Board Thread:Staff/@comment-8846246-20190501070818/@comment-30798631-20190502065855

I agree with all of Jack’s points.
 * I strongly oppose this. Like Jack said, the COA mostly comprises of past COTP members, and new Helpers + Interns can get confused or make the wrong decision. The modifications to the COTP System are made with the COTP benefiting from it. If we made any mistakes, the COA can always reverse it in another vote. Plus, the Head Helper can express their opinion during COA Meetings too, so if there is a major flaw with the new system, they can bring it up and we can re-evaluate.
 * Again, I oppose this. This is just rushing votes, instead of actually getting them properly voted. If this happens, votes can be extremely biased.
 * Eh, I’m neutral about this. I guess I lean towards support for the ‘Intern has first say’ concept though.
 * Support. As long as the mandatory votes are passed in time though. If they continuously cause a shut-down, we might need to put that first priority and evaluate that instead.