Board Thread:Staff/@comment-8846246-20190402130200/@comment-8846246-20190403004522

"disagree with letting the cotp fire helpers" - I'm not saying we should, this would give the COTP the ability to have the COA vote on it. Though I can remove this one, it wasn't actually meant to be in the final draft of the proposal because of a conflict of interest.

"limiting the head helpers proposals is retarded, we already struggle to get through ANYTHING." - That's what this is trying to help. You don't have to do 3 every meeting, but limiting it would prevent 100s of proposals slowing a meeting down.

"community feedback for idea proposals" - Phase 4's idea is to hammer out some of that feedback. Users don't directly propose to the COTP and then it goes to vote. The COTP looks at it and crafts a policy. Sometimes this is done by the Head Helper alone, and sometimes it can be done by other members via discussion.