Thread:Jackboog21/@comment-8846246-20180112042820/@comment-5346296-20180112220642

I can understand what you're getting at but if someone is banned from chat, the mod who banned them should be contacted, not their higher council, if the user is really persistent, sure ask another staff for a second opinion but in situations like that, there's no real need for a vote, when people are banned from chat, there's usually a clear answer (usually unclear answers occur when there's issue with the staff in question which would then be discussed by COA) things like chat/thread policy should do away with that problem quick. Fogs things up when they could be solved quite quickly, if the wikia grows to a certain point, then the amount of people banned from chat who have been banned for an extremely obvious reason will grow (especially with this fandom) so making it a council deal is a bit too much.

Unless that type of issue would only come up when there isn't clear reason.

Righty o, where would these take place?

Righty o, what happens in the event of a tie in a COA vote?

I don't think there's much of a point to interns, I think the current system in this regard is fine, if they do really make a difference then maybe we could wait to see that kind of thing in action on the fan wiki first, which would link with growing it which is great. If interns were added then I think it should be a 100% approval rate rather than a support/oppose vote, since they may have large influence in the event of ties.

Maybe, for future meetings, we should make like a 'what we're going to discuss' thing before we start so things are just sorted beforehand.