Thread:Jackboog21/@comment-8846246-20180112042820/@comment-8846246-20180113013121

Travid:

"making it a council deal is a bit too much"

Most would probably not go to the council. Whoever is precising over the council must agree to take on the case. So, for a Discussion case, either the Head Bureaucrat or Head Discussion Mod would both have to agree to hear it. This isn't how it works on Fan, but this is a more logical way for this wiki.

"Righty o, where would these take place?"

The Apply for Staff board will be renamed Staff board, as suggested by Grapeleaf in our last discussion on staff and meetings.

"Righty o, what happens in the event of a tie in a COA vote?"

Oops, I thought I had amended my post that detailed who is on what. I meant to edit the COA section to say "Head Helper (Tie breaker)" instead of "Head Helper (non-voting)".

"I think it should be a 100% approval rate rather than a support/oppose vote"

The winner would need 75% to be an Intern (3 votes). If someone got 2 votes and 2 other people got 1 each, the COTP would continue debating who to vote for.

Grape:

"This seems like a lot to implement all at once."

Not all of it will be. For example: Councils will not be hearing over warnings and blocks for now. The first thing implemented are the meetings and rule making parts.

"how this has served you on your Fan Wiki"

The size of the Fan wiki hasn't merited the system being used at all and it's only been in place about a month.

"Does this system merely sound good, or has it had concrete results?"

Sounds good, and the results will have to come from the experimental period.

"I recommend we start with adding staff meetings first and see how it goes from there."

That's the plan.