Board Thread:Staff/@comment-8846246-20180503020057/@comment-5346296-20180511103832

I'm sorry I don't understand what the second para is referring to? Unless I do, in which case, it's already a bit iffy adding a training rank (I don't dislike it I'm trying to word this how it might look to others) but a training rank that led to a bunch of demotions would probably look to others that we're lax in who we accept as staff. Younger users are going to think that anyway. (see the people who come to the wiki and ask to be staff as their first ever message on the wiki) Maybe this will be clarified when the wiki gets busier.

I just find people don't say anything, I usually look at staff when I go on wiki's and some wiki's ooo boy, but others are great, and that gives me a much better feeling about the wiki overall. When wiki's are a bit more... grounded? It feels more like that wiki is in much more a solid place, I don't know if I'm explaining this great hah. I guess one of the harder things is that I don't see many wiki's with helper like positions (At least big ones) so it's hard to compare.